Monday, February 10, 2014

Fair or Foul: Legalizing PEDs in Sports

by Ian Kinn

As it pertains to sports, a performance-enhancing drug is any substance which is used to augment the athletic ability of an individual.  Often referred to simply as PEDs, these drugs have long been utilized in athletics, from high school to a professional level.  Common examples include anabolic steroids, human growth hormone (HGH), amphetamine, and many other substances which have been banned in most professional and amateur sports.  Although they have been proven to enhance the athletic ability of individuals, PEDs come with a plethora of negative side effects, ranging from deepening of the voice to liver damage.

The primary criticism of PEDs is the unfair advantage they provide to individual athletes with respect to their “unenhanced” competitors.  However, if PEDs were legalized in sports, it would eliminate the advantage that any player could obtain over another, as everyone would have equal access to the substances.  Sports, especially professional ones, are by nature extremely competitive.  Enhancements are made in many ways, which are far from limited to just drugs.  Who is to say getting a leg up on an opponent through a PED is any different than having the advantage of better facilities and trainers than other athletes?  There are many different ways in which athletes gain an edge on the competition which could also be considered unfair.

Certain PEDs can undoubtedly have a negative impact on a person’s health.  However, it is each person’s right to determine the risks that they are willing and able to take in all other aspects of life, so it should be no different when it comes to increasing their performance on the field or the court.  If someone deems the potential rewards of taking PEDs greater than the risks, it is their right to do what they want with their body.  There is no potential of harming anyone but themselves.  Also, the sports industry is a business by nature, and PEDs have the potential to increase the entertainment value of every sport.  Viewers would be fascinated by longer home runs, high-flying dunks, and faster athletes.  Some of the most captivating sports stories have been brought about by the use of PEDs.  The race between Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa in 1998 and Barry Bonds’ home run spree a few years later remain as two of the most popular moments in baseball history, both of which were catalyzed by the implementation of PEDs.  By doing things which were previously unimaginable, they fascinated fans across the world and brought baseball’s popularity to a whole new level.

The line between legal and illegal substances in professional sports is already very gray and impossible to explicitly define.  An athlete such as Dwyane Wade can receive a Cortisol shot in his knee to help him play through the pain in the NBA playoffs, yet it is illegal to take certain drugs (such as HGH) which would help him to actually heal faster.  Legalizing PEDs would allow athletes to play and feel their best while entertaining the fans to the best of their abilities.  It would also save time and money, as the investigative committees would no longer be necessary.  Many people believe PEDs to be immoral and unsportsmanlike without basis.  Professional sports are all about doing whatever it takes to gain an advantage over your opponent.  Performance-enhancing drugs should be legalized in all professional sports, as they would increase the quality of sports and remove all suspicions of “unfair” play.

Sources:


No comments: