It’s a fine line
between cure, enhancement, and harm when it comes to certain innovative
substances. Social context and public opinion shape the circumstances in which
a drug is taken and even the effects it can have. Certain drugs are commonly
accepted as being detrimental to one’s health - alcohol, hard drugs, highly
addicting substances such as nicotine in cigarettes etc. However, when a new
drug enters the market, it is unclear whether it is medicinal, recreational,
beneficial or harmful. In the 1970s, Valium became increasing popular among
middle-aged housewives, and at first was seen as a tool to help them cope with
their daily frustrations. There was a shift in its place in society within the
decade, when feminists started to voice their concern that Valium was being
over-prescribed to women to subdue them into accepting their roles as passives
housewives. Valium later became obsolete with the rise of new anti-depressants
such as Prozac and Zoloft, which are commonly used today. Mood enhancing drugs
always walk the line between harming and helping, since they are addressing
psychological issues as opposed to physical ones. The new movie “Side Effects”
(2013), directed by Steven Soderbach and written by Scott Burns, dramatizes the
potentially catastrophic consequences of an anxiety-treating drug’s unexpected
side effects. Are these mood-enhancing drugs a source of freedom from
depression and daily stress or anxiety, or are they holding us back by
thrusting us into a pleasant but flattened haze?
Sources:
"Happy Pills in America", David Herzberg, 2009
"Side Effects", Steven Soderbach, 2013
Sources:
"Happy Pills in America", David Herzberg, 2009
"Side Effects", Steven Soderbach, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment